Breaking Down the Real Meaning of an XDR Solution
Read More
Explore how XDR boosts threat detection and incident response with enhanced visibility,
Cyberattacks are growing more sophisticated every day—ransomware, phishing, and insider threats slip past traditional defenses, leaving organizations scrambling to respond only after damage is done.
Imagine discovering that a critical server was quietly communicating with a malicious command-and-control server for weeks, or that a phishing email you thought was blocked bypassed your filters and installed a Trojan on multiple workstations. Each missed threat stretches your response time, increases remediation costs, and damages your reputation.
Threat intelligence and threat hunting work together to solve this. Intelligence arms you with external indicators—file hashes, malicious domains, attacker tactics—so you can block threats before they arrive. Threat hunting puts on the detective’s hat, probing your own network logs to unearth hidden intruders. Combined, they create a proactive security cycle that stops attacks early and continually sharpens your defenses.
With this guide, you have everything you need to build a strong foundation for threat intelligence and threat hunting, keeping attackers off balance and your organization secure.
Threat intelligence assembles, validates, and contextualizes information about existing or emerging cyber threats so you can block or detect them before they reach your network. By feeding accurate indicators into your security tools, you reduce false positives and free up analyst time to focus on genuine risks.
For example, say you receive a bulletin stating that a banking Trojan called FinStealer spreads via phishing emails with the subject line “Payroll Update.” You immediately update your email gateway to quarantine any message matching that subject and block the associated file hash in your endpoint protection. As a result, FinStealer never lands on your user’s desktops.
First, organizations collect data from various sources—open-source threat feeds, industry-specific information-sharing groups, internal vulnerability scans, and partner alerts. This raw data might include malicious IP addresses, suspicious domain names, file hashes of known malware, or even snippets of malicious code. Analysts then validate each indicator, ensuring it’s relevant to their industry and not a false lead. For example, a ransomware strain targeting retail won’t be a top priority if you operate a hospital network; instead, you’d focus on healthcare-targeted campaigns.
Once validated, these indicators are mapped against frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK, giving them context: is this a credential-stealing tool (mapped to “Credential Access”) or a privilege-escalation tactic? Tagging indicators under specific tactics helps analysts prioritize and align their defenses. For instance, if an indicator maps to “Execution” via PowerShell, your team knows to watch for unusual PowerShell commands.
Finally, high-confidence indicators are distributed to security tools—your SIEM (Security Information and Event Management), firewalls, email gateways, and endpoint protection platforms—often via automated feeds. When one of those tools encounters matching activity (e.g., a user opening the malicious attachment or a server trying to connect to a blocked IP), it generates an alert or simply blocks the traffic outright. This ensures threats are neutralized before they escalate.
By centralizing validated intelligence and tagging it with attacker tactics, you greatly reduce the time your analysts spend chasing false positives. Instead, they see only high-confidence alerts tied to known adversary behavior—even if that behavior shifts slightly, the MITRE mapping helps you catch variations.
Threat hunting is an active, hypothesis-driven process that searches for hidden threats already inside your network—often before a traditional alert fires. By interrogating your logs, telemetry, and user behavior, you find attackers who may be using legitimate tools or custom malware that slip past automated defenses.
For instance, if your intelligence indicates a backdoor called UpdaterAuto.exe is in use, you might hunt by querying endpoint logs over the past fortnight for any instance of that file name. Suppose you discover that the backdoor ran on a critical server in the middle of the night. You isolate the server immediately, remove the malicious executable, and patch the vulnerability it exploited—stopping a breach before data could be exfiltrated.
Threat hunting typically follows three steps:
Threat hunting uncovers stealthy attacks that automated tools may miss, significantly reducing your organization’s dwell time (the period an attacker remains undetected). By turning successful hunts into new detection rules, you continuously improve your security posture.
When threat intelligence and threat hunting operate in harmony, they create a continuous feedback loop:
Every iteration of this loop closes gaps. Even if a hunt yields no matches, it proves that existing controls are working. If you find a hidden backdoor, you remove it and adjust your rules to prevent reinfection. Over time, your threat intelligence becomes more customized to your environment, and your hunting hypotheses become more accurate.
Example Workflow:
A bulletin warns of a new ransomware strain, LockFast, dropping LockFast.exe via phishing. You push that hash to your SIEM and block the domain serving its payload. During a hunt, you query the past two weeks of endpoint logs for LockFast.exe and find it on a workstation where a user unwittingly clicked the link before your block took effect. You isolate the workstation, remove the payload, and patch the exploited vulnerability—neutralizing the threat before it spreads.
Below is an in-depth comparison table that highlights objectives, data sources, methodologies, outputs, skills, timing, use cases, example scenarios, and tangible benefits for each function.
| Category | Threat Intelligence | Threat Hunting |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Objective | Gather external IOCs and TTPs to prevent or detect threats early. | Search internal logs and telemetry for stealthy or active attacks. |
| Data Sources & Inputs |
|
|
| Typical Questions Answered |
|
|
| Methodology / Approach |
|
|
| Key Outputs / Deliverables |
|
|
| Skills & Roles Involved |
|
|
| When to Use |
|
|
| Detailed Use Case | Analysts block a new retail-targeting malware’s file hash and phishing subject before it spreads. | Hunters query logs for that file name, find it on one workstation, isolate and remediate the threat. |
| Benefits to Your Organization |
|
|
Below is a single, consolidated checklist to implement and integrate threat intelligence and threat hunting in your environment. Follow these steps to build a proactive, iterative security program.
Threat intelligence equips you with the external context—indicators and attacker tactics—while threat hunting uncovers hidden threats already inside your network. Together, they create a proactive defense cycle that reduces risk, shortens attacker dwell time, and continuously strengthens your security posture.
Start today—subscribe to a relevant threat feed, ensure your logs are centralized, run your first hunt, and iterate.
See Fidelis in action. Learn how our fast and scalable platforms provide full visibility, deep insights, and rapid response to help security teams across the World protect, detect, respond, and neutralize advanced cyber adversaries.