Discover the Top 5 XDR Use Cases for Today’s Cyber Threat Landscape
Learn how cyber deception in active defense helps detect threats early, mislead
Is your XDR solution truly comprehensive? Find Out Now!
In today’s evolving threat landscape, organizations are increasingly turning to advanced frameworks like Zero Trust and MITRE Shield to strengthen their security posture. Zero trust environments, with their emphasis on identity verification and micro-segmentation, play a crucial role in protecting sensitive data from insider threats and enabling early detection of compromised workstations. While these frameworks provide robust defensive capabilities, adding deception technology creates a more comprehensive security strategy that shifts advantage back to defenders. This technical blog examines how deception technology enhances these frameworks and provides practical implementation guidance.
Traditional perimeter-based security, often referred to as perimeter defenses, operates on the outdated assumption that everything inside the network can be trusted. Once attackers breach that perimeter, they can move laterally with minimal resistance. Zero Trust architecture addresses this by implementing “never trust, always verify” principles, but even this advanced approach has limitations when attackers circumvent controls.
Zero Trust architecture depends on a comprehensive trust model that ensures visibility into the environment. Advanced deception platforms like Fidelis Deception provide automated terrain mapping that continuously discovers, profiles, and assesses assets across hybrid environments. Organizations often uncover previously unknown assets during deception technology deployment, thanks to continuous terrain mapping and automated visibility capabilities. This terrain mapping capability serves as a foundation for both creating convincing deception layers and supporting Zero Trust implementation.
The most significant contribution of deception technology to Zero Trust is generating high-confidence alerts with minimal false positives. Since legitimate users have no reason to interact with decoy assets, any interaction indicates potential malicious activity. Enterprise-grade solutions like Fidelis Deception deliver high-fidelity alerts from decoys, Active Directory credentials, poisoned data, and suspicious traffic, directly addressing one of security operations’ biggest challenges: alert fatigue. While other security tools generate numerous alerts requiring investigation, deception triggers almost always represent genuine threats requiring immediate response. This allows security teams to detect attacks and focus resources on actual threats rather than investigating false positives.
Get the technical blueprint to trap attackers early and reduce alert fatigue.
What’s Inside the Whitepaper?
Zero Trust uses microsegmentation to prevent lateral movement, but deception technology adds another defensive layer by actively disrupting attackers when they manage to move laterally. Strategically placed deceptive artifacts like fake credentials and registry keys divert attackers, including those using stolen credentials, toward closely monitored decoys, keeping them away from valuable assets and providing security teams time to respond.
MITRE Shield provides a framework for active defense, and deception technology directly implements many Shield tactics. Additionally, the MITRE Engage matrix connects various defensive techniques and tactics, enabling defenders to apply the appropriate actions based on their specific tactical objectives and to enhance their understanding of adversarial behavior during engagements. The table below shows how deception capabilities map to specific Shield tactics:
MITRE Shield Tactic | Deception Implementation | Operational Benefit |
---|---|---|
Channel | Network traffic redirection, breadcrumb placement | Controls adversary movement paths |
Collect | Full packet capture on decoys, memory forensics | Rich intelligence on attacker TTPs |
Contain | Isolated deception networks, credential loops | Prevents access to critical assets |
Detect | Decoy access monitoring, credential usage alerts | Early warning with minimal false positives |
Disrupt | Resource-intensive decoys, misleading information | Wastes attacker time and resources |
Facilitate | Safe environment for threat hunting, TTP observation | Improves security team capabilities |
Legitimize | Dynamic asset emulation, real-time decoy updates | Creates convincing environments |
Test | Security control validation, gap identification | Continuously improves security posture |
Modern deception platforms automate deployment and management, providing high security value with minimal operational overhead.
A successful implementation of deception technology aligned with Zero Trust and MITRE Shield requires a structured approach:
Protecting identity stores is crucial in Zero Trust security architectures. Deploying identity-specific deceptions can effectively detect threats and unauthorized access attempts related to these sensitive assets.
Before deploying deception assets, automated discovery should map the entire corporate network environment, including:
This terrain mapping provides the foundation for both Zero Trust segmentation and strategic deception deployment.
Deception assets should be deployed strategically based on risk assessment:
Modern deception technologies use machine learning to automate and adapt deployment of decoys and breadcrumbs based on asset risk, ensuring that threats do not reach or affect actual production assets. For example, Fidelis Deception creates decoys from real assets, emulated services, operating systems, containers, cloud assets, and enterprise IoT devices while continuously updating lures, breadcrumbs, and fake Active Directory accounts to maintain a realistic deception layer. In hybrid environments, this deception coverage must extend across traditional infrastructure, cloud services, containers, and IoT.
Deception technology must integrate with broader security operations:
Integrating deception with Extended Detection and Response (XDR) platforms creates significant security advantages. This integration enables:
XDR platforms provide the rich visibility needed to build better deception layers, while offering alerts, insights, and metadata for threat eradication and forensic analysis. While deception can function independently, unifying it with NDR and EDR within an XDR platform delivers contextual visibility and integrated detection and response capabilities to anticipate and mitigate potential future attacks. Organizations implementing this integration have documented reductions in mean time to detect (MTTD) and decreased analyst investigation time due to the clarity of attack evidence provided by deception technology.
Cloud deception strategies for zero trust deployment include:
These deception assets blend seamlessly with legitimate cloud resources while minimizing cloud spending.
For critical infrastructure protection, deception should focus on minimizing the blast radius of potential attacks by implementing:
Healthcare-specific deception includes:
With healthcare being heavily targeted for ransomware attacks and insider threats, early detection through deception has proven valuable for maintaining continuity of care.
Recent advancements in deception technology include active defense based strategies that go beyond traditional methods of detecting and removing threats:
In today’s sophisticated threat landscape, organizations need more than preventative security measures. Integrating deception technology with Zero Trust and MITRE Shield frameworks creates a robust security architecture that:
Effective deception solutions offer automated deployment and management with minimal operational overhead, while providing high-fidelity alerts that enable security teams to detect post-breach attacks earlier without false alarm noise. This integrated approach, incorporating applicable active defense information, shifts the advantage from attackers to defenders by increasing the cost and complexity of successful attacks while providing defenders with clear visibility into adversary activities. The resulting security architecture not only improves detection and response capabilities but also establishes a foundation for cyber resiliency that allows organizations to maintain operations even during active cyber events.
Sarika, a cybersecurity enthusiast, contributes insightful articles to Fidelis Security, guiding readers through the complexities of digital security with clarity and passion. Beyond her writing, she actively engages in the cybersecurity community, staying informed about emerging trends and technologies to empower individuals and organizations in safeguarding their digital assets.
See Fidelis in action. Learn how our fast and scalable platforms provide full visibility, deep insights, and rapid response to help security teams across the World protect, detect, respond, and neutralize advanced cyber adversaries.