Free Trial
Schedule Demo
Comments
We’ve grown dependent on a perimeter. Vendors build tools that have no security at all without a robust perimeter. This term colors the way we as an industry think about security. The assumption of a perimeter makes decisions for us, we tend to assume that an internal system is better protected than one in the DMZ and give it a lower priority for security. This mindset is difficult to shed, and dangerous to keep, when you move operations to the public cloud.
In the public cloud there is no perimeter. The update server that the vendor wants “behind” a proxy is as much on the public internet as any proxy you would put in place. In the public cloud, you don’t control the network, and you don’t control the hardware. You do control the software.
How do we secure this environment without the same level of control that exists in the old model? We need to change the thought process. Instead of looking at the network from the outside in, and from the network layer up, focus on the host and the software.
The keys to successful public cloud security are: control of the software, a flexible security posture, focus on secure defaults, and anomaly detection. At this stage of the game, if you’re relying on a perimeter for your security, you haven’t build a hardened environment, you’ve built a brittle one.